Here are some tips for writing a critique on a journalistic article, but can apply to a range of similar assignments:
1. Read through the article once to get the main idea. The first time you read through an article, you should only try to understand the author’s overall argument.
2. Mark up the text as you read through it again and create a legend for your markings. Create a unique symbol to differentiate between parts of the text that might be confusing, important, or inconsistent.
3. Take some longer notes during subsequent readings. Record your initial reactions to the text. In addition to a legend, it is helpful to take notes when expanded thoughts come to you as you read so you can come back to them.
4. Develop a preliminary concept and outline for your critique. Form a vague opinion of the piece in question. Evaluate the journalist’s overall argument after you have read the article two or three times.
5. Make a list of possible evidence for your critique. Jog your memory for anything you've read or documentaries you've seen that might be useful for evaluating the article. Examine the author's introduction and conclusion to make sure they match up as convincing and complementary elements.
1. You can begin by questioning whether the writer's overall message is logical. One of the key things to look for when writing an article critique is the presence of any logical fallacies. Here is a list of some common examples of logical fallacies with brief explanations of each:
2. Search for any biased opinions, whether intentional or unintentional. Bias includes ignoring contrary evidence, misappropriating evidence to make conclusions appear different than they are, and imparting one's own, unfounded opinions on a text.
3. Examine the interview sources used and other quoted or linked evidence. Not only do the people interviewed need to be relevant and trustworthy, so do other sources used.
4. Evaluate the language and stylistic elements of the article.
1. Summarize the article. If you are writing a formal critique, this is an important step. A summary should be brief, and it should demonstrate that you know what the article is about. If you found an article difficult to follow, you might want to include that in your critique after your summary.
2. Discuss what works and what doesn't. The balance of an effective critique of a newspaper article will be the discussion of its strengths and weaknesses. Talk about whether the article was engaging, whether the headline was accurate, intriguing, or sensationalist, and your overall impressions of the article. Be sure to use specific examples when making general observations and try to suggest how you would fix what you perceive to be negative aspects of the article.
3. Analyze the article's slant and focus. Many articles have a slant, a unique way of looking at the subject. Even straight reporting of a newsworthy event has a slant that sets it apart from coverage in other outlets. You might also find, depending on the paper, a distinct bias in the article. Consider the language used and whether the article's writer treats both sides of the issue fairly. Consider the use of words like "claims" rather than "says" after a quote and its connotations — it suggests the writer does not believe the person quoted.
4. Address the article's accuracy. If you suspect something in the article has been misstated or is outright false, research it yourself. Most major newspapers have strict fact-checking rules, but mistakes can be made. Multiple factual errors in the same article or paper could point to a strong bias, an issue with the paper's credibility, or a lack of journalistic standards at the paper.
5. Be sure to follow the structure of any typical college writing assignment: disclose your main argument (thesis) in the introduction, each one of the body paragraphs should expand on a new point of the article and should start with a topic sentence and summarize your arguments at the end. Make sure to use APA style!
Finally, we encourage you to dig deep. Use your existing knowledge, educated opinions, and any research you can gather to either support or disagree with the author's article. Provide empirical arguments to support your stance.
While there is no such thing as too much good evidence, over-sourcing can also be a problem if your arguments become repetitive. Make sure each source provides something unique to your critique. Additionally, don't allow your use of sources to crowd out your own opinions and arguments.
Remember that a critique doesn't have to be entirely positive or negative. In fact, the most interesting critiques often don't vehemently disagree with the author; rather, they build upon or complicate the author's idea with additional evidence.
If you do agree entirely with the author, therefore, make sure to build upon the argument either by providing additional evidence or complicating the author's idea. You can provide contradictory evidence to an argument while still maintaining that a particular point of view is the correct one.
Don't “take it easy” on the author due to misguided empathy, but neither should you be excessively negative in an attempt to prove your critical bona fides. Forcefully express your defensible points of agreement and disagreement.
https://www.bestessaytips.com/writing_article_critique.php
https://www.wikihow.com/Critique-an-Article
https://essaypro.com/blog/article-critique
https://penandthepad.com/write-thesis-rhetorical-analysis-two-articles-4935.html
http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/RR/database/RR.09.09/cotcher/critique/newspaper-critique.html